Naval Today
  • Vessels
  • Equipment & Technology
  • Operations
  • Capital Investments
  • Authorities
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Naval Today logo

Your trusted source for naval and maritime news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Equipment & technology
  • Industry
  • Vessels
  • Operations
  • Training & Education
Network
  • Dredging Today
  • NavalToday
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • Maritieme Vacaturebank
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report Your News
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Funding›Australia facing submarine capability gap, report suggests
Funding

September 27, 2017 · about 8 years ago

Australia facing submarine capability gap, report suggests

The complicated process of designing and building new submarines from scratch could leave Australia with no submarines in its fleet over a period of several years, an independent report has warned. The Insight Economics report, commissioned by Gary Johnston from Submarines for Australia, suggests th

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

The complicated process of designing and building new submarines from scratch could leave Australia with no submarines in its fleet over a period of several years, an independent report has warned.

The Insight Economics report, commissioned by Gary Johnston from Submarines for Australia, suggests that there is a possibility for the new submarines to be delivered too late, which would be after 2036, when the current Collins-class submarines are scheduled to be decommissioned.

“So in a time of a heightened strategic threat, we may lack any credible submarine capability for a decade or more. And it takes a long time to restore that capability, not just by building platforms but in retaining personnel and being able to train new people,” Johnston says.

Another issue highlighted in the report is the cost which is, according to Australian National University professor Hugh White – who contributed to the report, too high for what the submarines will be offering in capabilities.

The report suggests that an estimated price of $40 billion in 2016 prices, or over $3 billion per submarine, is too expensive for a conventionally-powered submarine with no air-independent propulsion system. Purchasing off-the-shelf submarines was a more sound option, the report argues, giving comparative prices for both conventionally and nuclear-powered submarines.

You can read the full report here

Reach the Naval Today industry in one go!

Naval Today is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Naval Today on:

Filed under

FundingAuthoritiesVesselsEquipment & technologySubmarinesPropulsionBusiness & Finance

Daily news in your mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Canada and UK firms join forces to expand autonomous vessel operations in North America
  2. 2Australia invests another $4.6 billion in AUKUS submarine construction yard
  3. 3US Navy's final expeditionary sea base wraps up acceptance trials
  4. 4HII expands distributed shipbuilding model to US Navy amphibious ships

Related articles

Damen
Surface Vessels

Damen to refit four Royal Bahamas Defence Force vessels

1 day ago

Fincantieri cuts steel for Italian Navy’s second FREMM EVO frigate
Surface Vessels

Fincantieri cuts steel for Italian Navy’s second FREMM EVO frigate

5 days ago

Daily news in your mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free

Related news

Damen
Surface Vessels

Damen to refit four Royal Bahamas Defence Force vessels

1 day ago
Fincantieri cuts steel for Italian Navy’s second FREMM EVO frigate
Surface Vessels

Fincantieri cuts steel for Italian Navy’s second FREMM EVO frigate

5 days ago